Not a benchmark table. This puts pricing, context, interface fit, and key visibility into one decision card.
高质量写作与复杂分析强项，适合企业内容与知识场景。
轻量化企业助手和中高频 API 调用常用型号。
This is an internal Anthropic comparison, so the main question is tier, cost, context, and capability rather than provider switching.
On the listed price snapshot, Claude Haiku 3.5 is cheaper on combined input and output, but real routing, discounts, and limits still matter.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the larger context window, which helps with long documents, knowledge bases, logs, and multi-turn workflows.
Do not start with which model is absolutely stronger. Start with the boundary: cost, context, speed, quality, ecosystem, or supply stability.
If you already hold a key, the valuable check is provider identity, callable models, and whether balance, limits, or subscription status are visible.
Commercially, do not look at model names alone. Combine price, limits, region, upstream stability, and ongoing monitoring.
