TestKey.ai logo
TestKey.ai
KEY CHECKER & MODEL MARKET
You are hereHome
Model comparison

o3 vs o4-mini

Not a benchmark table. This puts pricing, context, interface fit, and key visibility into one decision card.

Provider
OpenAI / OpenAI
OpenAI
Context
200K / 200K
text+image->text / text+image->text
Input price
$10.00 / $1.10
per 1M tokens
Output price
$40.00 / $4.40
per 1M tokens
Left model
o3
OpenAI
Familyo-series
Modalitytext+image->text

复杂推理和工具链场景常用旗舰。

Right model
o4-mini
OpenAI
Familyo-series
Modalitytext+image->text

适合推理型产品化调用和代理场景。

Comparison summary

How to choose first

This is an internal OpenAI comparison, so the main question is tier, cost, context, and capability rather than provider switching.

On the listed price snapshot, o4-mini is cheaper on combined input and output, but real routing, discounts, and limits still matter.

When context is similar, compare output quality, API stability, limits, and actually callable models first.

Decision boundary

Do not start with which model is absolutely stronger. Start with the boundary: cost, context, speed, quality, ecosystem, or supply stability.

  • o3 is worth checking first when the o-series family, 200K context, and text+image->text capability match the job.
  • o4-mini is worth checking first when the o-series family, 200K context, and text+image->text capability match the job.

Key checking route

If you already hold a key, the valuable check is provider identity, callable models, and whether balance, limits, or subscription status are visible.

  • OpenAI: o3, o-series, text+image->text
  • OpenAI: o4-mini, o-series, text+image->text

Commercial fit

Commercially, do not look at model names alone. Combine price, limits, region, upstream stability, and ongoing monitoring.

  • o3: 复杂推理和工具链场景常用旗舰。
  • o4-mini: 适合推理型产品化调用和代理场景。